Sponsored post – ebuzzing launches in UK

ebuzzing is a new tool being rolled out here in the UK.  I’ve been registered with them for a while – you know how it is when you have a blog and you see something that suggests you might just make some money from your blog. Firstly, I guess I need to say  that I have no ambitions to make a profit from blogging, not the slightest reason why I first started this off. I guess the money I get for writing this blogpost will cover my annual cost for hosting the domain and the various add ons I use here. Might also get to buy Mrs Refblog a bottle of cider!

This seems like a relatively easy way to get started. Firstly, do as I did and register on ebuzzing.com. They then marry up your site with what their advertisers want and then suggest that you might want to prepare a sponsored post flogging whatever it is they are offering and you get some £/E for the pleasure. Easy eh?!?

There are different options you can choose to start the money coming in. You can either use:

  • Video campaigns with a dedicated player [Now that I can show videos I might start doing this!]
  • Video campaigns using “syndicated players” and banners : player and banners
  • Articles written about brands and services that you want to recommend to your readers

Example of how videos sit on your blog.

More than 800 advertisers have proposed campaigns to bloggers with the help of ebuzzing such as Coca-Cola, Intel, MTV, LʼOréal, MasterCard, Toyota, Electronic Arts, Ubisoft, eBay, Canon, Diesel, Warner Bros, Philips, StudioCanal…  Not bad company!!

For bloggers, ebuzzing is a way to make money by monetising their blogs thanks to video postings and content creation.

Worth giving a go? I think so.
Sponsored Post

The things people search for….

just looking at my blog stats. Today people found my site by searching for:

  • rugby i hate brian moore 2010
  • worst rugby referee steve walsh

Well, there you go. Interesting eh!?!

Shirt of Hurt – Sport Relief

Here’s the proof of my Shirt of Hurt experience on Friday with Refblog Jnr (also participating although Im not sure he really understood it!!)

I’m pleased to report a grand total of £240 has been raised for Sport Relief – a great cause! Thanks everyone!

Pressure is on!

Well, after a long trek up north for a relegation play off, it seems the pressure is building nicely!

The Championship, for those who don’t know is this year being decided by a lottery play off system with the top 8 (as of last weekend) playing off in 2 pools to end up with a deciding match for who gets promoted* and the bottom 4 playing off in a pool at the end of which the bottom side gets relegated.  I’m not going to get into the politics of all this – there’s plenty of chat around about that elsewhere (check out Rolling Maul for starters!).  All we can do as referees/officials is to rock up and referee what we see in front of us!

Yesterday, I officiated in round one of the relegation pool. Two very focussed sides before the game and you could tell this was all different – and important.

As it turns out, the home side played much better than the visitors and thoroughly deserved to win the game, and with the added try bonus point to boot! I think this pool could come down to bonus points at the end of the day so we’re having to be absolutely aware of all the scenarios etc, make sure we are 100% accurate on time and to let the players decide on the outcomes of the match. Yesterday was a good example of that with the home side scoring their fourth (bonus point) try well after time was up on my watch following a lengthy passage of attacking play.

For those of you berating the 6N games for being pants, an afternoon in the Championship could be an eyeopener!!

Next weekend? Who knows! Appointments are being made on a week-by-week basis and with some results yesterday,  I suspect the draft may have been ripped up and they’ll try again today. Interesting few weeks ahead!

* Actually there are only 2 sides I believe have met the Premiership criteria, so will be v interesting to see what happens if neither gets to the final or wins it!

S14 press conferences

Does anyone know if these are actually taking place? With the Paul Marks debacle I thought I might go and find the post match press conference, a clip of which I expected to find on YouTube. But no. Any southern hemisphere readers care to enlighten me/us?

Ta

Ref

Identity

Evening all

Was explaining this blog to someone the other day and when I explained why it was anonymous, I stumbled and couldn’t really finish the sentence. Ive been musing since on where to be more open about who I am as I guess most readers know anyway.Would it matter?

So, to support the theory (and the fact that I just noticed the Poll function) please vote now:

Cheers
Ref

Refblog in action!

Just found this on YouTube. What fun!

IRB Law ruling – when does game end?

Following the recent Wales v Scotland and the Wales v France games the WRU have saught clarity ove rthe end of games when there has been a score and time is close to being up:

11 March 2010
Ruling: 2: 2010

Request from the WRU
The WRU request a Ruling related to time at the end of a match:
The request for a Ruling arises from the ending of two recent international
matches and is in relation to the way a restart takes place following the
referee’s communication that it is to be the “last play” of the match.
If the ball is kicked directly out on the full from the restart it should be left to the referee’s discretion to decide whether:
(a) If Law 10.2 (a) Intentionally Offending has occurred
(b) If Law 13.8 Kick offs/ Restarts has been fully complied with.

Observation:
The Laws relating to Kick Offs/Restarts for 15-a-side matches would benefit
immensely from the variation to Law 13.7, 13.8 and 13.9 currently operating for seven-a-side rugby, which are quite specific, in that, it is a free kick to the nonoffending team should a team infringe the above.

Ruling of the Designated Members of the Rugby Committee
The Designated Members have ruled that if there has been a score towards the end of the game and there is time for the kick off to take place but time will expire immediately after the kick and the kicker:
• Does not kick the ball ten metres
• Kicks the ball directly into touch
• Kicks the ball dead on or over the opponents touch-in-goal or dead ball
line

The referee will offer the non-offending team the options provided by Law 13.7, 13.8 and 13.9 respectively and the match continues until the ball next becomes dead.

 

For once, an unequivocal ruling. No grey in there!

Props – you know they talk sense

Just catching up on Claire Daniels blog. She has a great quote from a Premiership prop which she liked, and I like so Im shamelessly copying it here. When discussing refereeing the front row:

“You try doing a squat with 800kg, stand on one leg, cover one of your eyes and then get smacked in the other – half the time I don’t know what’s going on, how do you expect a referee to?”

Quality!

Live by the sword….

Suppose this is the downside to being a professional referee:

Source: The Australian

Referee binned after Tahs error

AUSTRALIAN referee Paul Marks has been dumped indefinitely from Super 14 matches following his handling of the NSW-Sharks match, with SANZAR referees chief Lyndon Bray admitting yesterday a last-gasp penalty try should have been awarded to the South Africans.

Sharks coach John Plumtree complained bitterly after Saturday’s 25-21 loss to the Waratahs at the Sydney Football Stadium that the Sydney-based Marks should have ruled Kurtley Beale’s 78th-minute knock-down of a pass to Ryan Kankowski warranted a penalty try — which would assuredly have handed the Natal side the victory.

Instead, Marks gave Beale a yellow card and only awarded the Sharks a penalty. From the ensuing lineout, he penalised Sharks prop Jannie du Plesis for obstruction in a rolling maul after he had lifted jumper Wilhelm Steenkamp to win the throw barely a metre from the NSW tryline.

The referees’ selection panel of Australian Andrew Cole, South Africa’s Tappe Henning and New Zealand’s Colin Hawke, taking account of Marks’s performances in his past two matches, voted to drop him from the Super 14 panel until he has rectified shortcomings in his game management. South African referee Pro Legoete has also been stood down indefinitely.

“There was some imbalance from a management perspective, how he (Marks) arrived at these big decisions and how they were presented,” Bray said.

The SANZAR boss said Marks’s decision not to award the Sharks a match-winning penalty try was only one event and his overall handling of the game was taken into account.

“In fairness to Paul, you could debate the penalty try ruling all day,” Bray said. “We believe the right decision in the cold light of day was to award a penalty try, but you could argue why a referee would back off it.”

Cole maintained that front-on video footage had shown that contrary to South African claims Kankowski would have had an unimpeded run to the tryline, Waratahs centre Tom Carter was coming across in cover defence.

“Admittedly he had a fair bit of work to do, and we all know how quick Kankowski is,” Cole said.

“But Paul would have seen him in his peripheral vision . . . he would have known there was a defender there.”

Cole will work with Marks on improving his game management, and is confident he will be back refereeing at the top level before the end of the Super 14 tournament.

But his demotion comes too late for the Sharks, who take a 0-4 win-loss record — and a feeling that nothing is going their way — into their match with the Brumbies in Canberra on Saturday.